We don't have very many reviews of Fitness Master yet.
Have experience with this brand? Join the internet's FAQ and share your review now.
Fitness Master Review
Based on online research and 3 Fitness Master reviews, Fitness Master's overall score is 2.8 out of 5 stars. Fitness Master's review score is based on Fitness Master's customer ratings, its brand popularity, its price competitiveness, as well as the breadth and quality of features it offers to customers. The Fitness Master review table below incorporates summarizes 3 Fitness Master ratings. You can also compare Fitness Master against popular alternatives like Planet Fitness, 24 Hour Fitness and Crunch. Or you can view the top 50 brands in similar categories, such as health brands, fitness & exercise brands and fitness memberships & class stores.
Brand popularity
Fitness Master Review: Fitness Master Pros & Cons
Fitness Master (fitnessmaster247.com) is a smaller fitness memberships & class store which competes against other fitness memberships & class stores like Planet Fitness, 24 Hour Fitness, Crunch, Anytime Fitness and P.volve. Read the full Fitnessmaster247.com review below for more details.
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
Knoji has 3 Fitness Master reviews and ratings as of June 30, 2026. Knoji editors and the Knoji shopper community have reviewed Fitness Master and compared it against 1,610 top fitness memberships & classes brands, reviewing Fitness Master based on product and store features. Knoji reviews and ranks Fitnessmaster247.com and other fitness memberships & class stores based on how many features each offers and based on a 5-star rating scale. Based on these factors and 3 Fitness Master reviews, Fitness Master earns an overall score of 2.8 out of 5.0 points. Fitness Master's review score also factors in its popularity, which is in the mid-range to lower-range compared to competing .
